| |

How Crocodiles Escaped Mass Extinction — Twice

A digitally composed image shows a prehistoric reptile—resembling an early crocodilian or basal archosaur—walking across a volcanic landscape. In the background, a volcano erupts dramatically, spewing lava and ash into the sky. The scene illustrates a time when ancient reptiles thrived amid extreme geological activity, hinting at the resilience and evolutionary success of early crocodile relatives.

And what their survival story can teach us today

I still remember my first time holding a fossil crocodylomorph skull in my hands. It was smaller than I expected — no bigger than a loaf of bread — and nothing like the scary reptiles that lurk in today’s rivers and swamps (skulls can be so deceiving!). But there was something about its toothy grin and oddly shaped snout that made me pause. 

These weren’t just ancient crocodiles. They were survivors. And as I dug deeper into their story over the years, the word survivors kept coming up.

A new study just added an exciting chapter to their tale.

Published in Palaeontology, the research by Dr. Keegan Melstrom and colleagues sheds light on how the ancestors of crocodiles and alligators survived not just one, but two of Earth’s biggest extinction events. 

But more importantly, their findings challenge the old stereotype of crocodilians as “living fossils” that avoided evolution. Instead, it turns out, their ancestors were remarkably adaptable, which might be the secret to their success.

Fossil crocodylomorph specimens not usable for geometric morphometric analyses but appropriate for linear morphometrics. A, Araripesuchus gomesii (AMNH FARB 24450). B, Cricosaurus suevicus (SMNS 9808). Both specimens are preserved at angles that render dorsal and lateral views unavailable for photography in comparable alignment with other specimens. Scale bars represent: 2 cm (A); 10 cm (B) — Melstrom et al., 2025

Ancient Survivors with a Hidden Superpower

Crocodylomorphs (the larger group that includes today’s crocodiles, alligators, and gharials) have been around for over 230 million years. During that time, they lived through two of Earth’s major extinction events: the one at the end of the Triassic period, and the more famous one that wiped out the dinosaurs at the end of the Cretaceous.

What set them apart?

“Lots of groups closely related to crocodilians were more diverse, more abundant, and exhibited different ecologies, yet they all disappeared except these few generalist crocodilians alive today,” said Dr. Melstrom, the lead author.

The study found that crocodylomorphs who made it through mass extinctions were dietary generalists. In other words, they weren’t picky eaters. Whether it was bugs, small animals, fish, or plants, they could make a meal out of whatever was available. And that flexibility turned out to be life-saving.

Landmark configuration and linear measurements illustrated on Mariliasuchus amarali (MZSP PV 000050). A, dorsal geometric morphometric landmarks and linear measurements. B, lateral geometric morphometric landmarks. Red circles represent landmarks; black dots represent semilandmarks. Abbreviations: AOW, midline width at anterior edge of orbit; MSL, maximum skull length; MW, maximum skull width; OL, orbit length; OW, orbit width; PDP, premaxilla to distal edge of parietal at the midline; PMW, midline width at premaxilla–maxilla suture; PO, premaxilla to anterior edge of orbit; POW, midline width at posterior edge of orbit; UDL, upper dentition length. Scale bar represents 2 cm — Melstrom et al., 2025

A Closer Look at Skulls and Habits

To figure this out, the researchers examined the skulls of 99 extinct crocodylomorph species and 20 living crocodilian species. They analyzed them using geometric morphometrics (a way to study shape and structure) to look for clues about diet and habitat. They also compared these ancient creatures to modern mammals and lizards to get a sense of where they fit ecologically.

Fun fact: there used to be a freely available online course about geometric morphometrics that used my face, together with other PhD students at the time. 

It was a huge effort that involved museum collections across seven countries and four continents. But it paid off. The team discovered that crocodylomorphs used to be way more diverse than their modern descendants suggest. 

Some were aquatic predators. Others were land-dwelling herbivores. Some looked a bit like mammals. Others, more like lizards.

But across that whole range, the ones that made it through extinctions were the ones that could eat (and live) just about anywhere.

Flowchart illustrating how ecology was reconstructed using separate lines of evidence for this study. Geometric (GM) and linear (LM) morphometrics were used to determine dietary ecology, which utilized categories that could be compared to previous research, such as orientation patch count rotated (OPCR), stomach contents, and dental histology. Using these dietary categories, ecology was separated into generalist or specialist strategies, which permitted testing using Fischer’s exact test. Finally, these data were combined with habitat preferences to visualize how ecology has changed through time — Melstrom et al., 2025

The Real Jurassic Survivors

Most people think of mass extinction survivors as furry, burrowing mammals. And they’re not wrong. But crocodylomorphs were doing something similar, in their own cold-blooded way.

At the end of the Triassic, around 201 million years ago, the world went through a major shake-up. Giant land reptiles that had dominated the scene (i.e. pseudosuchians) disappeared. But small, generalist crocodylomorphs made it through. Over the next 135 million years, they exploded into all kinds of forms, including bizarre land walkers and sleek marine hunters.

Then came the meteor and the end-Cretaceous extinction. This time, it was the semiaquatic generalists (creatures with diets and lifestyles closest to modern crocodiles) that survived. That’s why all 26 species alive today are some version of a water-loving ambush predator with a flexible appetite.

Morphological disparity of living amniote and extinct crocodylomorph skulls in dorsal view. Morphological disparity (sum of variances, box and whisker plots) of extant mammals, lepidosaurs, and crocodylians is plotted on the left whereas the morphological disparity of extinct crocodylomorphs from the Late Triassic until the Palaeogene is on the right. Procrustes variance of extinct crocodylomorphs through the Mesozoic and into the early Cenozoic is denoted with a dotted line. For box and whisker plots, the second and third quartile are represented by boxes, upper and lower quartile by ‘whiskers’, median by the dividing line, and outliers by open circles. Phylogenetic relationships are not considered, in contrast to Figure 8. Pseudhesperosuchus jachaleri (left) and Borealosuchus formidabilis (right) represent extinct crocodylomorphs. Number of taxa in each time bin is denoted on the x-axis — Melstrom et al., 2025

Why This Matters Now

Earth is currently facing what scientists consider a sixth mass extinction. This one’s not caused by asteroids or volcanic eruptions. It’s caused by us, humans. Habitat loss, climate change, and pollution are pushing species to the brink.

So what can crocodilians teach us?

“If people study mammals and reptiles and find the same patterns with respect to extinction survival, then we might predict that species with a generalist diet may do better,” said Dr. Randy Irmis, co-author and curator at the Natural History Museum of Utah. “That information helps us make predictions, but it’s unlikely we’ll ever be able to pick out which individual species will survive.”

Still, understanding what traits helped ancient animals make it through turbulent times might help us shape conservation strategies today. Flexibility, in diet, habitat, and behavior, seems to be a powerful asset.

It’s a useful reminder that adaptability often beats specialization in the long run.

Morphological disparity of the crocodylomorph skull through time as measured by sum of variances (A–B) and Procrustes variance © in dorsal view. A and B utilize different time-bins, which account for differences in plotted disparity patterns, whereas C includes an additional time-bin for modern taxa. Sum of variances measurements take phylogenetic relationships into account, unlike Procrustes variance measurements. Low morphological disparity after the Eocene is due to reduced sampling relative to other time bins. Light and dark blue shades (A) represent 75% and 97.5% confidence intervals, respectively. Dashed yellow lines represent Triassic–Jurassic and Cretaceous–Palaeogene boundaries — Melstrom et al., 2025

The Grin That Outlasted Dinosaurs

The next time you see a crocodile basking on a riverbank, try to picture the long evolutionary line behind that grin. These animals aren’t just leftovers from the dinosaur age; they’re the winners of a million-year-long survival game. Their story isn’t one of stagnation, but of transformation, versatility, and quiet endurance.

They’ve outlasted meteor strikes, volcanic winters, and continental drift. Whether they’ll survive the Anthropocene depends not just on them, but on us.

Because even the best survivors need a place to live.


Published in Fossils et al. Follow to learn more about Paleontology and Evolution.

Do you want to become a writer for this Publication? Read the Submission Guidelines and fill out This Form.

Do you want to read more stories like this? You can now subscribe to my newsletter and join a community of over 11,000 Earth lovers!

I’m thrilled you’re here. Stay curious, and thank you for sharing this journey with me!

Best,

Sílvia P-M, PhD Climate Ages v

Join my mailing list!

Join my newsletter to explore how to transition from academia, build impactful side hustles, and communicate science effectively.

As a bonus, download my FREE Boosted Blog Method Cheat Sheet to kickstart your journey into science blogging and making an impact.

The boosted blog method teaser

Similar Posts

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *